Wednesday, February 25, 2009

latex

so, as a result of my total immersion approach to \LaTeX for the last couple of semesters, i've grown rather fond of the typesetting system.

actually, i've wanted to post a couple of items about latex, or at least that included latex. that blogger doesn't handle latex natively has held me back, though. that and laziness. (the internet was all the way over there, and i was all the way over here.)

but i finally searched and found something to facilitate the scratching of this itch. yourequations.com provides a javascript latex render. color me excited. so, here's me stretching my muscles:

{n \choose k} \left( r(1-r)^{g-1} \right)^k \left( \sum_{i=0}^{n-k} {n-k \choose i} (1-r)^{ig} \left( r^2(1-r)^{g-2} \right) ^{n-k-i} \right)


this added ability has also necessatated an update of the blog's look. i liked the black background, but i'll survive.

of course, i say that i'll post more often, but this is in no way suggestive of actual change, nor is it in any way legally binding.

Tuesday, February 10, 2009

people or powers?

another sleepless night. i could read, as if i'd get anything out of it. so i'll write something instead. it'll be a little stream of thought.

i saw push the other day. i enjoyed it. it was entertaining and pretty. i have yet to see what's so great about dakota fanning, but that's beside the point.

it seems to me that there's a lot of stuff featuring super-powered people with real lives. ok not really a lot, but plenty enough. so i'm thinking about the different aspects of these different offerings, and what's important and what's not and whatever. i come to the conclusion that perhaps the central (assuredly subconscious) consideration for stories of this genre is whether the people or the powers are more important. the idea generalizes to other genres too; for example, with respect to sci-fi, are the people or the technology more important.

i don't think placing more importance on one necessarily takes away from the other. nor do i believe that a preference for either is necessarily better. perhaps some examples are in order.
  • x men is definitely about the powers. there is the obligatory talking, "character development", but we just want to see wolverine kick someone's ass and storm fly through a big ol' thunderstorm, sending lightning bolts into the bad guys.
  • batman (with bale) is more about the people. the powers (if they can be called that; mostly toys i guess) tend to be (spectacular) extensions of each person's character.
i couldn't really come up with a third example. i wanted something that balanced people and power that wasn't lord of the rings.

i suppose, ideally, a balance should be sought.when they're well done, powers are the shiny glitter that gets people interested in a story, and people are what keep people interested in it. it might be a cop-out to just shift gears between people parts and power parts. at least i think so.

i'm not saying to do away with strictly people parts or power parts. i'm suggesting that some effort should be made to tie the character development to the use of powers. for instance:
  • the character learns a secret he could not have learned had he not used his power
  • the mere fact of having a power changes the character's personality and/or how everyone sees him
  • the nature/effectiveness of the character's power changes as he grows
  • the character despises his power and/or refuses to use it
of course, these ideas could be handle in an unbalanced way. but to get any balance, it's necessary to make at least some link between the person and the power.

if we ever move again on the rule of three, i think i'll keep more of an eye out for this balance. i think so far we've done well, but it's been a while.

Saturday, February 7, 2009

so, whacha doing?

i should find a way to distinguish which entries are for which project. this entry, for instance, is more of a journal entry than a project update.

so, what have i been doing? well, when i'm not reading for school, i'm reading Nausea. It's a short book (only a couple hundred pages), but it's a slow read. a crazy person who's always referring to french places is just a little hard to follow.

also been wasting a bunch of time on facebook playing mafia wars. i don't know why, but it's pretty addictive. i can't wait till i get tired of the game. it's basically a dressed up numbers game, so i don't expect to in it's thrall much longer. Check this, and this.

a new distraction is making demands on my attention. not much to say, since i haven't started, but i'm thinking about learning to draw. for real. i'm thinking about buying supplies next time i'm on campus.

as far as writing goes, not really feeling it. i'm basically on hold until rodd finishes the first draft of the screenplay. i tried to do something on another project (darla's world), but there's a ton of work to do there: political environment, religion, alternate ontologies, etc. soooooo, that's gonna come as it comes.